March 24, 2026

Racial Disparities in Victim Compensation Program Claim Approvals for Adult Survivors of Sexual Assault.

Share
Facebook
LinkedIn
X

Racial Disparities in Victim Compensation Program Claim Approvals for Adult Survivors of Sexual Assault.

A new study published in the American Journal of Public Health led by Resound Research’s Samuel Dickman examines racial disparities in victim compensation claim approvals for adult survivors of sexual assault across 18 US states between 2015 and 2023.

Victim compensation programs are designed to alleviate the financial burdens associated with violent crime, including medical care, mental health services, and forensic examinations. These programs function outside of the criminal justice system and do not require a conviction. However, access depends on meeting specific administrative requirements.

The study analyzed 42,902 claims filed by women survivors of sexual assault and found significant racial disparities in approval rates. After adjusting for age, state, and application year:

Black and Indigenous women’s claims were significantly less likely to be approved than White women’s.

Approval rates varied widely by state, ranging from 29% to 94%.

The most common denial reason was a determination that there was insufficient evidence that a crime had occurred.

Incomplete applications and failure to establish economic loss were also frequent denial reasons.

The findings suggest that administrative burdens — including paperwork requirements and cooperation standards — may contribute to inequitable outcomes.

Victim compensation programs are an important safety net for survivors of sexual assault. Ensuring equitable access requires careful examination of institutional processes, eligibility requirements, and referral pathways.

Policy reforms in some states have begun addressing these issues by removing police reporting requirements and simplifying applications. Continued evaluation and reform are essential to reduce disparities and strengthen support systems for survivors.

Read the full study in the American Journal of Public Health here:
https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308304#:~:text=Claims%20by%20survivors%20of%20sexual,year%2C%20and%20state%20fixed%20effects

Details
Date
March 24, 2026
Reading time
< 1 min
Related Publications

Racial Disparities in Victim Compensation Program Claim Approvals for Adult Survivors of Sexual Assault.

Post-Dobbs Realities: Data Transparency and Trust in Maternal Health Care

Preferred strategies for obtaining abortion care among pregnant Texans: A latent class analysis

How Texas Abortion Bans Affect Mental and Emotional Well-Being

Dr. Gracia Sierra, PhD, MA Named 2025 Changemaker in Family Planning

When States Can Exclude Family Planning Providers, Access Suffers — and Millions Are at Risk

Effects of Time Constraints Under Texas’ 6-Week Abortion Ban

A new peer-reviewed study by Resound Research reveals how Texas’ SB8 law that prohibited abortion upon the detection of embryonic

Should Teens Need Parental Permission to Access Birth Control?

Resound Research for Reproductive Health Dr. Kari White joins Rice University’s Baker Institute podcast to discuss how Texas policies limit

Why Confidential Contraception Matters for Texas Teens

Minors in Texas face legal barriers to confidential contraceptive care—barriers that impact their health, autonomy, and access to effective methods.

Houston Chronicle Op-Ed

In a new op-ed for the Houston Chronicle, "Texas’ proposed abortion exceptions bill fails to recognize the complexities of pregnancy,"

Care Post-Roe: How Post-Roe Laws Are Obstructing Clinical Care

Our collaborative report, led by UCSF’s ANSIRH, reveals that over two years after Roe’s fall, abortion bans still hinder medical

Two Years Post-Dobbs and Counting, Courts and Agencies Still Fall Short in Supporting Reproductive Autonomy and Evidence-Based Care

Two years after Dobbs, abortion bans heighten health risks. Recent rulings in Idaho leave emergency abortion care access uncertain.