March 15, 2021

Publicly Funded Reproductive Health Care Programs for People with Low Incomes in Texas, 2011-2021

Share
Facebook
LinkedIn
X

Publicly Funded Reproductive Health Care Programs for People with Low Incomes in Texas, 2011-2021

Access to reproductive health care is important, especially for those without insurance coverage. Publicly funded programs help ensure that everyone has access to contraception, STI testing and treatment, screenings for reproductive cancers, and other related services. In Texas, state and federal funds work together to support those with low incomes by offering care at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), public health departments, non-profit women’s health centers, and hospital-based clinics.

From 2011-2021, Texas made several changes that impacted how reproductive health funding is distributed and what services are covered. Because of these changes and the state’s decision not to expand Medicaid, many low-income individuals have had to navigate a complicated and evolving system to get the reproductive health care they need. This has made it harder for those most in need to access evidence-based care.

Recent estimates suggest that around 25% of women aged 15-49 in Texas—about 1.7 million—are uninsured. Without Medicaid expansion, many of these women fall into a “coverage gap,” meaning they don’t qualify for Medicaid or subsidies to buy insurance through the Marketplace. The issue is even more significant among Latinx, Black, and undocumented immigrants, as changes in Texas have had a greater impact on these groups.

Policies that create equitable access to comprehensive, evidence-based reproductive health care are essential to public health. This can be achieved through a coordinated and inclusive strategy across federally and state-funded programs that expands the safety net and closes the gaps in access to reproductive health care for Texans who are in need.

In this brief, we summarize key changes to Texas’ funding for reproductive health care for people with low incomes, focusing on 2011-2021.

  • 2011-2013 Cutting funding and prioritizing primary care providers
  • 2013 – 2016: Expanding and later narrowing the scope of services
  • 2016 – 2021: Remaining needs in the patchwork of programs

We also look ahead to the future directions Texas’ family planning programs could take.

Details
Date
March 15, 2021
Category
Journal Articles
Journal
University of Texas at Austin
Authors
Emma Carpenter, Klaira Lerma, Laura Dixon, and Kari White
key findings
Citation
Related Publications

Barriers to Preferred Contraception Use in Mississippi

Introduction: Many Americans are not using the contraceptive method they prefer, but there has been limited study of how this

Abortion Care Preferences and Trade-Offs when Traveling Out-of-State for Facility-Based Services: Findings from a Discrete Choice Experiment

This discrete choice experiment examining Texans' preferences for out-of-state facility-based abortion care demonstrates that people seeking abortion prioritize wait time

Texas’ Alternatives to Abortion Program: Historical Overview and Funding Analysis

Mississippi Abortion Clients’ Strategies to Pay for Abortion Care and Manage Economic Hardship